Obama In Trouble As Young People Think About Their Futures

Every once in awhile, a succinct phrase puts everything in perspective. In his final debate against incumbent Jimmy Carter in the 1980 presidential election, Ronald Reagan made a simple, yet devastatingly effective statement. He asked that when we vote, we ask ourselves, “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” The answer to almost everyone in the country was, “no”.

In 2010, Sarah Palin spoke to the National Tea Party Convention and asked a similar question that resonates as much now as it did in 2010, “How’s that hopey, changey stuff working out?” The answer then as now: not very well.

According to The New York Times, President Obama may be in serious trouble. As I’ve discussed recently, the donations are drying up for the Obama Campaign. But equally devastating to his re-election bid is the lack of enthusiasm amongst young voters that proved to be so integral to his 2008 campaign. Using terms like “pointless” and “discouragement”, the New York Times article paints a bleak picture for Obama.

The article claims that Obama is still in the lead for voters under 30. However, in the age range of 18-24, the potential voters in and graduating college, he will face some real challenges. In 2008, this group was integral to the Obama Campaign. However, now the Obama Campaign is only leading Romney by 12 points in this group. If we look at only whites in this group, Romney and Obama come out about even; this is bad news for a campaign that, last time, relied so heavily on record voter turnout for minorities as well as voters under 30.

While Obama is still the favorite, low voter turnout amongst younger voters has always been a problem for candidates, and so the 12 point lead, being a fraction of what it was in 2008, does little for Obama if they do not vote. In fact, 30% of the voters polled under 30 had not yet decided what political party they will belong to.

Director of Polling at Harvard Institute of Politics John Della Volpe noted,

“The concern for Obama, and the opportunity for Romney, is in the 18- to 24-year-olds who don’t have the historical or direct connection to the campaign or the movement of four years ago. We’re also seeing that these younger members of this generation are beginning to show some more conservative traits. It doesn’t mean they are Republican. It means Republicans have an opportunity.”

As younger populations typically have low voter turnout, the strategy for Republicans doesn’t have to be one designed to compete heavily with Obama. It can be to marshal resources and pay less attention to the younger group, as many simply will not vote, period. Like in Blackjack, sometimes, the right strategy is to do nothing and let the dealer bust.

There is a reason why Obama has lost favor with the younger crowd. Those 18 to 24 years of age are being hit the hardest by this recession. With a 23.5% unemployment rate for the group, nearly 1 in 4 have no job. When we account for underemployment, we see 54% of people between the age of 18 to 24 are in precarious financial positions. Those who were too young to vote in 2008, but can vote now, see the devastating effects of a poor economy. Those who had voted for Obama in 2008 are, largely, no better off, thus answering the question, “How’s that hopey, changey stuff working out?”

In fact, things are so bad for this age group, Time Magazine discussed a survey that found that 85% of college graduates return to live with their parents after graduation. Yikes! With an unemployment rate of 23.5% and a rate of 85% of students returning home to live after graduation, it is plain to see that the harsh reality of socialist failings has devastated a generation of Americans. With that many down-and-out college grads, it’s easy to see why they may not be as thrilled with he who had promised “hope” and “change”.

What a let down it must be to those who engaged in the political process the first time, only to discover that the charismatic Senator that promised to turn the establishment on its head has not only produced nothing of value, but has made things worse. Like so many charismatic personalities have done before, Obama rode into office with a promise to dismantle the old regime and the old ways of doing things. But here we are, four years later, and those who helped to get him elected are the ones most marginalized.

The ones that bought the “hope” tee shirts, emblazoned with Obama’s divine image, and the ones that made annoying YouTube videos to promote the young Senator with more style than substance, are now in a position to answer the question, “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” With 85% living in their old rooms at mom and dad’s house, one could logically say that they’re exactly where they were four years ago. And that’s the problem.

This entry was posted in Economy, Election 2012, Movement, News and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Obama In Trouble As Young People Think About Their Futures

  1. pearl says:

    The problem is that between Obama and Romney, it’s hard to tell which is worse. It’s a sucker’s bet that Romney would repeal the “healthcare” bill he designed!And we have already RINO senator McConnell, that he won’t even try to repeal. So, I have to ask, does anyone really believe there is a party that stands for liberty an the rights of the people? We will have to stand for ourselves, it seems. The founders did their best to hand us a government that would be amenable to respecting boundaries. We have failed to keep it in check. The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.
    “A people may prefer a free government, but if, from indolence, or carelessness, or cowardice, or want of public spirit, they are unequal to the exertions necessary for preserving it; if they will not fight for it when it is directly attacked; if they can be deluded by the artifices used to cheat them out of it; if by momentary discouragement, or temporary panic, or a fit of enthusiasm for an individual, they can be induced to lay their liberties at the feet even of a great man, or trust him with powers which enable him to subvert their institutions; in all these cases they are more or less unfit for liberty: and though it may be for their good to have had it even for a short time, they are unlikely long to enjoy it.” — John Stuart Mill, Representative Government, 1861

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>