Nanny State News: Government Becoming The Ultimate Backseat Driver

This has been a big couple of weeks for nanny-staters and those that loathe individual liberty. Fresh off a big win for statists, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood announced his national initiative to once-and-for-all end the scourge of our time: cell phone usage while driving.

His initiative, called the “Blueprint for Ending Distracted Driving”, is aimed at states that have not already banned the practice of driving and talking. But while LaHood would like to see states adopt this ban, he made it clear that he would like to see Congress enact a national ban.

LaHood, dropping any pretense of trying to “curb” distracted driving, has opted for the more direct route. “The bottom line for me is to get where we’re at with seatbelts and with drunk driving,” LaHood said. “When those programs were started, people were very skeptical that you could get people to buckle up.”

While LaHood may be right that seat belts are good ideas, he is wrong in the assumption that it is the government’s role to legislate on behalf of what are good ideas. Rather than being in the business of legislating that which is good for us, those that govern should be more concerned with maintaining an administrative function.

How long until there are bans regarding cell phone usage and talking? Wait, too late, it’s already here. Police in Fort Lee, New Jersey, are ticketing pedestrians who text and walk. Claiming it’s a distraction, police are issuing tickets that are $85. This is precisely the slippery-slope problem we need to address.

Currently, 39 states prohibit texting while driving while 10 states ban cell phone use altogether. Meanwhile, a comprehensive study last year found no conclusive evidence that hands-free cell phone usage was any less dangerous. Furthermore, it found no evidence that cell phone and texting bans have reduced crashes. More than simply being ineffective, such laws function as the proverbial camel’s nose under the tent and only beget more of the same. Nanny-statism runs rampant and more and more laws are created by a government that, quite frankly, has bigger fish to fry.

Using both the “stick” and the “carrot”, the House and the Senate have been mulling over how to address this “problem”. In the House in 2009, a bill was pushed by several lawmakers to twist the arm of state governments by withholding federal highway funding until they pass appropriate anti-cell phone legislation. Considering such thuggish tactics worked to get the drinking age raised to 21, I see this as highly likely.

The Senate went with a different approach and has been considering a bill pushed by Democrats that award grants to states that play ball and outlaw texting and hand-held cell phone usage while driving. The windfalls are to be used to educate the public about the dangers. I honestly don’t know which tactic I find more abhorrent: the one that uses extortion to achieve federal ends or the one that treats us like children being rewarded with candy for doing what we’re told.

Maybe I’m not marching on Washington, but I am committed to my own form of protest. I talk and drive. I do it not because I am merely unwilling to change; I do it because I do not recognize this arbitrarily prohibited action as any more dangerous than other actions which are allowable by law. I talk and drive while others change CDs, eat hamburgers, hold dogs in their laps or do all of them at the same time. If, as a pedestrian, I get hit by a car driven by someone on a cell phone or someone with a dog in their lap, am I any less injured one way or the other? Either we need to ban everything that isn’t “hands at ten and two”, or we need to accept inherent risks of driving, and take personal responsibility every time we take the wheel. Personally, I’m rooting for the latter. Alas, I’m willing to bet that this isn’t the last we’ve heard of the nanny-staters.

This entry was posted in Nanny State News, News and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Nanny State News: Government Becoming The Ultimate Backseat Driver

  1. Obama’s Message To American Graduates …

    “Welcome to your life. You are worthless. In fact, you are in debt. We are giving you a national debt that is greater than the GDP, and every other nation in the history of mankind has collapsed soon after reaching that milestone. Upon its coming collapse, which will happen in your lifetime, but not mine, America is likely to be taken over by Global Socialists & Islamists who will take away your freedoms, raise your taxes to over 90%, and decapitate all who speak out against government. Don’t even think about having children, because we will abort them, even after delivery, leaving you with emotional scars for the rest of your lives. Welcome to the Islamic Gulag of America! Have some cheap Vodka! It will kill the pain!”

    • Ben Franklin (pre-death) says:

      1) Nations with radical Islamic theocratic governments have ZERO tax rates. They are the most corporate-fascist friendly places NOT socialist friendly places. 2) I’m no fan of Obama, but this situation is hardly his doing. Way to point your finger at the scapegoat-puppet. This situation was in the making for over 100 years. 3) Globalist socialists are behind the near systematic genocide of Islamic peoples. The Middle East has seen over 1 million deaths in the last year alone. That is the doing of the global “socialist” which uses privatization and private corporations to do their work while they sit behind the board room safe and snug while you point the finger at whichever puppet is in office at the time.

      Although I agree with a generalized overview of what you say, your detailed vision of the future is not only impossible, it is ridiculous. And you can thank Reagan (or should I say George Bush Sr., the ex-CIA director who actually made all the decisions while the actor played his part on TV) for most of our economic woes since he systematically destroyed our manufacturing base and unchained Wall Street with sweeping deregulations. Welcome to now.

      • Ben Franklin (pre-death) says:

        oops. I mean Iraq itself experienced over 1 million deaths in the last 10 years thanks to us. But you get the idea.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>